Lapatinib minimally effective for non-small-cell lung cancer& }0 K) _. e3 d
MARCH 18, 2010% Y+ q8 A' G0 v, S& M
3 F, g8 a0 e3 y, F8 S: x, }7 r
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Although well tolerated, lapatinib is minimally effective as monotherapy for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to a report in the March 15th Clinical Cancer Research.5 F1 v$ H8 k4 i2 ] _9 E" C" u+ P
G- }* ^7 ?) M. e+ g! a H
Lapatinib (GlaxoSmithKline) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2, the authors explain, and thus has theoretical advantages over inhibition of either EGFR or HER2 alone. 0 Y% w5 u4 X1 n, [' [
" ^3 _: p. m2 z. G% x* Y, Q* CDr. Helen J. Ross, from Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, and colleagues evaluated the overall response rate to lapatinib in 131 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Sixty-five patients were randomized to lapatinib 1500 mg once daily and 66 to lapatinib 500 mg twice daily.
: r& W: S9 ]% M! B# a* r! E' u% J/ L" Q9 Y9 x$ L2 }, _; {; O
When the study began, patients with any type of advanced or metastatic NSCLC were recruited ("non-targeted" population). However, when data from other studies began to show that EGFR inhibitors are particularly effective in patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and in never-smokers with any histology of NSCLC, recruitment began to "target" such patients.
# [; }7 U p: _* I" F% r; i% \) L3 v5 T6 ^4 x9 c0 q4 @
The targeted population included 24 patients in the 1500 mg/day group and 32 in the 500 mg twice daily group. The corresponding numbers in the non-targeted population were 41 and 34.
4 u9 {5 R6 b" E K7 {, ]- e/ a/ ?8 F, c* w p# \$ w; z8 @! ]
At the interim analysis of the first 30 targeted patients to reach the initial response evaluation, the response rate was 0% in both treatment groups. In the non-targeted population, one patient in the 1500-mg group achieved a partial response.
5 x) |) r( d3 y4 e8 g# p9 A% i& s1 `- a( D+ u! M9 M0 c
Overall, 31 of 131 patients (24%) had stable disease or better.
* L8 c' U/ M6 }4 Y' y' \/ g# X& B6 b
Based on these findings, the study was stopped for reasons of futility, the investigators state.
9 h. }6 m. E1 L; r% @) G# B% g0 V9 Z8 j& A4 k4 x9 J
Overall survival in the targeted population was 15.2 months for the 1500-mg once-daily group and 13.9 months for the 500-mg twice-daily group, and in the nontargeted population, overall survival was 11.4 months for the 1500-mg once-daily group and 8.1 months for the 500-mg twice-daily group. 1 _0 F$ u9 _9 X; I
% X& g! N& ]1 w8 \% C
Median progression-free survival was 15.6 weeks (1500-mg once-daily) and 8.7 weeks (500-mg twice-daily) in the targeted population and 12.0 weeks (1500-mg once-daily) and 8.6 weeks (500-mg twice-daily) in the nontargeted population. c2 `: c: {& e0 }$ X
; t4 z7 S/ x: d8 c; k" DThe incidence of adverse events considered to be related to study medication was 89% for 1500 mg once daily and 83% for 500 mg twice daily, but only 8% of patients in each group experienced serious adverse events related to study medication. ' X6 n6 N+ I' \2 \. r8 |
, e1 y8 N/ o& e( `# O) W% A' f% ^
Among 92 patients with tumor tissue available, 2 had mutations in EGFR and 1 had mutations in both EGFR and KRAS. None had mutations in HER2.
& @5 u2 w& a: D1 g
8 E: G2 H4 p; _7 [Of 77 patients with sufficient DNA for gene copy evaluation, 5 (8.8%) had increased EGFR copy number and 2 (3.5%) had increased HER2 gene copy number. + S5 X, E% ~4 `, Y' n
9 t% M+ o9 W' j1 M9 B) ]
None of the patients with EGFR mutations responded to lapatinib, and only 1 patient with HER2 amplification had an unconfirmed decrease of 51% in tumor measurement.
& T K8 e8 F7 f( } @% w# b y& m# i5 P/ w7 A; T
"Lapatinib as a single agent at the doses studied seems to have minimal single-agent activity, at least as measured by response rates," the authors conclude, "although progression-free survival in the 1500-mg once-daily group was in the range that would be expected with first-line chemotherapy." - I$ D$ c/ _; J( h- ~5 y( b
' ^( o! ^, @; {+ y4 I% i- F# |"Patients in this small study had a suggestion of disease stabilization with lapatinib," Dr. Ross said. "It would be of interest to examine it in the adjuvant setting after resection perhaps, after chemoradiotherapy perhaps or after up-front chemotherapy. It is possible that combination with other targeted agents, such as anti-angiogenic agents, might be useful."
& I+ X3 {- I# ]" m3 D: j& l! T: Y. B! a/ E' i$ M' T
The study was sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline.
/ |: w7 J' N7 b. s: q& S! s0 N |